BOOK 2. THE BATH SCHOOL. N. LEVASHOV'S «SVETL BROOM» IN A. KHATYBOV'S «BATH SCHOOL» AND A LABOUR SPADE

F. Shkrudnev N. Levashov's "SvetL Broom" in A. Khatybov's "Bath School" and A Labour Spade 7 important problem, not earlier. In the future, more often, as history shows, the "genius" no longer makes discoveries and rests on primary laurels, and his bibliographers invent one story from his life more beautiful than the other, casting a gloss in the image of a newly made genius. Here the psychologists are zealous and when studying the creative work of a scientist, as a rule, do not have any idea about him, they have never solved any complicated scientific problem by themselves, except for "psychological" cubes, squares, and the like. That's why Nicolai Viktorovich himself wrote his autobiography in advance, having stated in it in normal Russian what is important for him, as a scientist and a personality, a historical one now. About his strategy, as a creative personality, is sufficiently detailed in the book. True, "serious" scholars do not read such books, where there is no senselessness, but there is information they do not even know about, and which is expressed in "unscientific language", and therefore it is unreliable. And what then should be the language of science, so that such books could be read by everyone? Most of the representatives of science believe that it should be strictly "scientific", logical, not to cause multiplicity in reading, i.e. be clear only to specialists. And if earlier, before the reforms of the Russian language, the word carried an image in itself, then since 1918 the Russian language has become imageless thanks to the reforms of Lunacharsky A. and C o . Read the textbook on electrical engineering of the late 19th century, and you will see that there was another scientific language, i.e. a real Russian language. It is not by chance that ordinary people try to read popular literature, which is often loose interpretation from scientific language into Russian, permitting inaccuracies and fictions. And is there any single, general scientific language? Nowadays, in each scientific area, a professional language has been developed that is intelligable only to its apologists, so the nuclear physicist does not understand the physics of celestial mechanics, etc. It turns out that there is no general scientific language. So is it worth inventing a bicycle when it's already created – is it the Great and Mighty Russian Language? Is it time to write science in Russian, in normal Russian? A great number of loan words from English, French, German and Greek, which are secondary languages, does not solve the problem at all, because you still need to know the translations of these loans. It comes to the point of absurdity. Thus, so that the child in the form of a new theory, invention and other intellectual product could step into life, you have to learn to write in normal