BOOK 1. UNMASKING THE HIDDEN. N. LEVASHOV'S «SVETL BROOM» IN A. KHATYBOV'S «BATH SCHOOL» AND A LABOUR SPADE.

F. Shkrudnev N. Levashov's «SvetL Broom» in A. Khatybov's «Bath School» and A Labour Spade 9 curiosity begins, determined the contents of the books by Feodor Shkrudnev. It could not be otherwise. But his chosen path and the style of presentation are limited from different sides – the publicity of the information presented is restrained with absolutely non-public details and fundamental discoveries. As far as generation is concerned the author has said a lot without saying anything that could give the appearance of knowledge. For biologists it will be important to read and learn about the real structure of a living cell, known to them from traditional scientific publications, but they will have to make sure, that scientific journals and their authors do not have the slightest idea either about the structure of a living cell, or about its capabilities. What you really get from reading the Book but what cannot touch is the information and an impressive push (as they say – "kick") to thinking it over. The style of the text probably seems to be structured in a somewhat unusual logic. You may not find either some common logic or simplicity of exposition in this Book in that form which is accepted for the reputable and claiming to be fundamental publications. Everything is quite different here, and is likely to be similar to the DNA helix in that form in which it first appeared in the thoughts of its first observers. The most complicated design, with numerous interconnected and interdependent, strictly verified and conceived by someone , but at first glance, looking like a very incredible and intricate tangle of «don't know what". When you begin to look into, following the windings of the stated events and facts, you see strict helical structure, which invariably brings you back to the previously mentioned facts, making you see their connection with the others, and appreciate their place in the overall design much deeper. On the following turn the same, already "familiar" facts seem to be mentioned not quite casually , but having their specific place that is defined not by coincidence, but by previously unnoticed and misunderstood regularities. This kind of perception makes you reorganize the whole construction created in your head after reading – it is getting more complicated, acquiring some rigorous simplicity and significance. I think any person related to some scientific activities in the modern sense of the word, cannot ignore the issue of involvement to the proceedings (both yours and others') literary sources. Indeed, with this we are all very strict – plagiarism is punishable and to rely on the works of predecessors is imperative. Failure to follow these scientific morals is fraught with very unpleasant consequences. There is no problem to find the sources of all mentioned, to keep to strict adherence to the authorship, to nurture your