BOOK 1. UNMASKING THE HIDDEN. N. LEVASHOV'S «SVETL BROOM» IN A. KHATYBOV'S «BATH SCHOOL» AND A LABOUR SPADE.

Book 1. Unmasking the Hidden. Acknowledgments 10 own works, and to observe accuracy in the references to the works of colleagues and teachers. It is necessary to clearly track of what is whose, to avoid confusion, when all "this" is going to be transferred into tangible assets. The chain is not intricate – who came up with the idea, developed it, got under it (you need to substitute – the Department, a grant, place, job, an entire institution, rank, degree, position, honor, monograph, recognition, etc.) – that one is the owner, and no one should forget it – the ability to convert it into profits, as well as amuse your self-esteem and support absolutely essential in the scientific community ambitions must be maintained in the operable condition. The converse is also true –should you have published something obscene – that is something that brings about such a sober and fresh look at the existing ideas making the whole pyramid topple over – then references to this ugly creature mark an outcast, a renegade in his frenzy being carried too far – someone might say with a sigh, " Well, he did give some hope!.." However, those works that are created with another purpose, those ideas that are born not in the frame of the old System, something that breaks down the Foundation, clearing up the place for the substantial construction of the mind in the direction of finding the truth, do not even include such a notion as plagiarism . Therefore, those for whom the very essence of this phenomenon is something Sacred may not move further as all most sacred shall be ruthlessly destroyed as not wanted. That is “the BROOM” for – to slash vigorously up to scratches on the "body", and the anguished cries of plagiarism just will not be understood or heard – the “Bath School” is too far frommodern science and its postulates. Well, as far as the text of the Book is concerned – just try to ask such a question: How can you make the reader conceive what the Book say about otherwise? It is a rhetorical question – no matter the way you try but for the author to get the intended the only possible way is to involve what was said by one Man and what was written in this respect on another level of understanding by another Man, and what the third Man added to all this without decorating with so favorite references – and to present it to the reader as a single continuous whole in all its infinite capacity and the development of thought. And if the reader sees the point the desire to break the book with some acknowledgment does not appear – it will do such work in your head, that your own suffering Brain will begin to generate for itself quite unexpected things. But to calm the requirements of morality of every reader, none of these People – the Authors of the texts, partly given in the Book, are hidden, on the contrary, their names become more significant than any record-largest