N. Levashov's «SvetL Broom» in A. Khatybov's «Bath School» Book 3. The Cell and Health

Book 3. The Cell and Health. Chapter 4. Ages and ages ago and in today’s realities 222 not change your way of life, even if you change your understanding of the world. Only singles are able to. Majority will live with the same goals as before. The nature of our world, society, power and Man is such that the destroyer of the society foundation including science, will always be qualified as the dangerous and sacrilegious. The people always live on the principle of "haven’t read, but condemn..." using the Internet (mostly) opportunities recklessly and with impunity because many people say so (who also haven’t read, but heard somewhere from someone...) Today we can not realize that the one who creates the information, eventually forms the world around us. The one who creates the main information in a certain direction on which our consciousness and subconsciousness develop, he gives the rest of the world and the world around us the main direction of development. Attitude to information is determined by the source of information. If we believe the source of information by virtue of our Knowledge and understanding, this will determine our attitude to this information and its application (or non-application) in life practice. For many, the reason to turn away from the truth is the contradiction of the generally accepted interpretation of the event. Agree, very few people will recheck the arguments of one or another, for example, scientist, if only because it is unrealistic to check that enormous work. The majority always chooses the beaten track, no hesitating about where it leads to. It's neither bad nor good, it's just as true as true are the statements: the water is wet, the darkness is dark, the mass is blind. The study of facts does not promote anything in itself. And many have already made sure of this today. However, our ill-wishers use it in the part of juggling and distorting these facts. Imagine a car, dismantled to the last screw, a heap of details. A certain person knows every detail of this heap. At night, wake him up and ask what kind of detail for № 29486, he will accurately list all its parameters. But he does not have the concept of a car (say, he's from the Aztec civilization, who did not even have a concept of a cart). The second person does not know the parameters of the details, but has the concept of a car. If you set the task to assemble a car from the car parts, the first one will not even understand what is required of him. The second has a chance to solve the problem. One is a scholar, he knows the parts, but he has no concept of the whole. The second knows the whole and therefore is more capable in this situation. Similarly, with knowledge – as long as there is no integral concept – there is not a single