Afterword. "SVETL BROOM" IN A. KHATYBOV'S "BATH SCHOOL" AND A LABOUR SPADE. BOOK 5.

Книга 5. Сложность и степень ложности. Послесловие 8 information perceived by the Brain. It rejects what it does not understand. The peculiarity of the Russian language is in its imagery, it is the most sophisticated in perception of the material and intangible images, in their world perception and, in this regard, it is the most vulnerable. It is powerful by the word, and vulnerable to the word! For this reason, one must be MORE TOLERANT and try to take the received materials without distorting the text. It really comes from the true Control System. Therefore, it is necessary to get used to it – this will be our new format of language communication. People are far from what they think of themselves. Ascribing to themselves some high degree of consciousness and independence, emphasized by various absurdities from religious, atheistic, esoteric and other (which is irrelevant due to the general restricting function, inherent in all of the aforementioned) lists of gifts and abilities we unconsciously, only by this, CONSIDERABLY RESTRICTED even that small possibility of our own development, which despite everything remained in working conditions in some people. It’s basically no different, for example, any publicly criticized average sect with a mandatory set of a “leader plus followers” flavored with some outlandish rites and obscure dogmas – and a narrow scientific trend – there is also a leader there that has to be respected and promoted; with the followers (lower and middle-level research workers), and quite outlandish rites and dogmas, which correspond to the experimental and theoretical parts of the scientific work. It is somewhat easier for science, because society must support it “morally” and financially, and sects are self-sufficient and censured by the majority. But the scheme of consciousness that worked for a man and that was given to him in the existing design DID NOT ALLOW more deviations, except for those allowed, which were manifested by the rich, by our standards, variety of available “social” constructions, reliable and invisible to the highly conscious, supposedly Man, in our opinion, limiting any possibilities of real development. The simplest experiment, possible for everyone – when making the acquaintance in absentia, for example, when your friend tells you about a third person who he is familiar with, to the question “ what is he?” – the expected answer will be a profession in most cases. In a second place – belonging to a religious or financial group. These are all OPTIONS of the EXCEPTED NORM – a person was successfully integrated into the system, he/she was its working material. Omitting the extreme options (criminals, drug addicts, alcoholics, etc.), we get a small remainder – a defect of the system – a situation where it is difficult to say about a person what he/she is. In most cases, they themselves can hardly clearly self-