BOOK 2. THE BATH SCHOOL. N. LEVASHOV'S «SVETL BROOM» IN A. KHATYBOV'S «BATH SCHOOL» AND A LABOUR SPADE

Book 2. The Bath School. Chapter 1. His chekmate to the System 80 anyone else using the notorious "binary" system of thinking about which it is well said in The Third Appeal to Mankind: "... the basis of the maximum mediocre Personality are the notions of " yes " and " no ", as allegedly existing and repeatedly manifested in the stepwise analysis of any complex process, including the evaluation of the activities of a particular Personality. The more so, the number of steps in the analysis is finite and, most often, very few, even if you are investigating rather a serious problem. The search for the answer is reduced to choosing one of the two, where two is the number of steps of possible solutions, while the most correct solution lies between them. Your mathematicians will understand the following analogy: the solution of the problem that comes out after solving particular questions of the type "yes" – "no" is analogous to the choice of one of the vertices of the N- dimensional cube, whereas the space of possible solutions consists of all points of the N -dimensional space. If to clarify, then the REAL DIMENSIONALITY OF SPACE SOLUTIONS is most often determined by you incorrectly and very rarely is in fact a numerical one, the present attitude towards you as an intelligent race is hampered by the following considerations of the information order. As far as one can judge, any scientific or legal law, the meaning of any discovery or invention, the essence of any important thought can be expressed by any phrase consisting of one hundred words from the vocabulary of 50,000 words, including mathematical and other symbols. The total number of possible phrases of such a vocabulary seems to be a very modest value equal to 100 . If phrases with only a diagnostic essence are taken, that is, determining the essence, their number is reduced to 50. If now we discard phrases in which the words are grammatically correctly connected, but their content does not even have any meaning, then the number of meaningful phrases will be reduced to 25. In fact, by selecting true from false statements, according to the most overestimated estimates, gives a list of only 3-10 statements and no more that could be expressed and correspond to reality. Meanwhile, representatives of the animal world on various Planets are known to be able of giving no less of various unconditioned reactions, quite adequate to reality, to various combinations of external stimuli, which, nevertheless, can not be called intelligent. Yes, and there is this kind of representatives on the Planet, too. Apparently, it would be more correct to consider Mankind to be not intelligent, but POTENTIALLY INTELLIGENT RACE , since the limitations of thinking, as you already see, could not have been innate in you... " So, only this way, and not otherwise. But most people, unfortunately, are not able to realize this even in their worldly life".