BOOK 2. THE BATH SCHOOL. N. LEVASHOV'S «SVETL BROOM» IN A. KHATYBOV'S «BATH SCHOOL» AND A LABOUR SPADE

Book 2. The Bath School. Introduction, or the wish in the reality 10 "improbable" coincidences which everyone comes across in one’s life and which increasingly become the subject of scientific study. Like any faith, the belief in the omnipotence of physical laws is in principle unfounded - following the Kantian "scandal for philosophy». 1 One can say this was a "scandal for science". For the last three centuries FAITH IN SCIENCE has really had a nearly religious character: "Belief in the truth of scientific knowledge in the second half and the end of the XIX century often outweighed the religious faith". Today, alas, our schools and universities teach not so much the movement forward, dynamics, development, as stops, finals, "completed" knowledge. Science is presented as a built temple, although, in my deep conviction, we have not yet gone beyond the "zero cycle", the foundation, the origin point. Scientific work begins with the processes that are going on in our consciousness, and OUR CONSCIOUSNESS IN THE PROCESS OF KNOWLEDGE DOES NOT HAVE TO STAGNATE IN THE KNOWN , it must follow the path of modernization and renovation, and not along the path of some teachers, the so-called "scientists", university professors, with their courses of lectures rather closing, than opening new ways. Nothing happens by chance, everything has an initial cause. Any phenomenon has many sides, and this leads to unjustified discussions, in which opponents defend their curtailed "truth" from their "point of view". All this is a typical consequence of the differentiation of knowledge, replacing the integrity and unity of consciousness-being with its primitive "truths". Alas, human practice is largely built on this shaky ground: an accessible part of reality is taken for the whole reality. This applies to all spheres of human activity, replacing the completeness of reality with schemes and models, taken for science and truthfulness. New paradigms in science are born every time when there are contradictions of the old and new knowledge and there cannot be in another way. Difficulties inevitably arising with an attempt to replace old ideas with new ones indicate that IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF SCIENCE FAR FROM EVERYTHING LIES IN THE FIELD OF SCIENCE . Formal evidence and logic are just one layer of ideas, but there are lots of others. When it comes to changing paradigms, not the ideas are changing, but the way of thinking, the quality of consciousness. In order for Ptolemy's system to yield to the Copernican system, it was not the logic of his followers that was required, but a change in the world outlook. I do not think 1 After J. Berkeley, J. Kant called the scandal for philosophy the impossibility to prove the existence of the world outside us theoretically.