BOOK 1. UNMASKING THE HIDDEN. N. LEVASHOV'S «SVETL BROOM» IN A. KHATYBOV'S «BATH SCHOOL» AND A LABOUR SPADE.

F. Shkrudnev N. Levashov's «SvetL Broom» in A. Khatybov's «Bath School» and A Labour Spade 23 Introduction Getting down to this work, I proceeded from the fact that a good book puts in good order the available knowledge. It takes our thoughts out of the consciousness, pulls them out of the corners of the subconsciousness, extracts from our heart and sticks them together to make NEW knowledge. As a result, a new "4" is given rise from already existing "2+2". New, sprang up of the existing, is NOT supposed to BREAK the harmony of the former. Thus, in my opinion, the worldview becomes more complete and clear. For those who has read N. Levashov and proceeded to A. Khatybov (although understanding little from the above), who persistently advances in his knowledge, it would be worth taking the bull by its horns, and get at the meaning of the Bath . But to be objective – are there many such ones now? The undoubted majority is hardly capable of adequately perceiving any Genotype of the Brain, an incomprehensible albedo and frequency ... And ebro-spiders, the Earth capture and their Control System (SEC), are not "our" Sun and Moon? And about a LIVING cell, and who and where " got in there and what for" it is not of this world. Where is the sequence of events (in the form we “were taught”) backed up with «advanced studies", artifacts and "world known" names of "explorers"? When REFLECTIVELY reading Nikolai Levashov , everything is logically «being revealed «to the reader, and well grounded that can hardly be refuted, and all the material is outlined in succession. You CANNOT find all this in A. Khatybov’s (as a result of the ban on most of his works). I do want to give information that is to be turn into a NEW knowledge of the one who reads it. It's like an emergency aid, suddenly stopped before the very nose of a lost person with no hope to survive. But this new knowledge is not collected together, it is like a heap of garbage, which is lying around. Should it be assembled – and there comes out a miracle of technology. Those who master this technique will no longer turn to someone else's help. This is what I would like to convey to the reader. I got at a noticeable conclusion: people are mostly READY for a NEW knowledge, BUT the logic of GRASPING this knowledge is ineffective. This explains the fact why disputing such topics, even among those " WHO PERSEIVED ", do not lead to anything. The debaters being preconceived believe that THE MOST important material is presented in a non-logical