BOOK 1. UNMASKING THE HIDDEN. N. LEVASHOV'S «SVETL BROOM» IN A. KHATYBOV'S «BATH SCHOOL» AND A LABOUR SPADE.

F. Shkrudnev N. Levashov's «SvetL Broom» in A. Khatybov's «Bath School» and A Labour Spade 211 inquisitive eye to some SPECIFIC FRAGMENT of the UNKNOWN, "examined" it, and finally "received an element of supposedly more perfect knowledge" as another step in their world view development? Why then for thousands of years was it to torment people? Might it have been better to learn everything at once and immediately, that is, much earlier? But who opposed or controlled this process? Before the expedient time, no one invented or created anything, was not able to surprise with any extraordinary discovery of the World. Everything was done, discovered, invented and applied strictly with the tact of the programmed requirements for the general Civilization development of people . Simultaneously, that was also an important part of the Target Vector of the FUTURE PHENOMENA , actions and events in that part that somehow related to the Civilization development with the usage of people. Not their development, but the development with their usage. Was there any element of randomness in this stability? Of course, there was NOT ANY RANDOM. This was the way the entire communication system of the Atmosphere layer No 6 worked and manifested itself, realizing two strategic programs: "Development of the Brain Genotypes" and "Development of the Energy Biogenesis of the Flesh" . And they thought and ate, and were geographically settled, and socially equipped, and almost all obediently took everything for "naturalness" of the surrounding habitat, and worshipfully 33 accepted DEFICIENCY OF WILL and VIOLENCE towards themselves, etc.. Everything only in line with the Program, including the very formation of Consciousness in all its forms of life manifestation. Skeptics may object to it by demonstrating, as evidence, some fragments of deviation from the generally prevalent level of event processes, rebellion or disobedience on the part of SOME INDIVIDUALS or groups of them. After all, there were plenty of them in the history of many countries. How should one perceive the assertion of some kind of controllability from the outside, imminent obedience in action and resignation to one’s fate, i.e. some kind 33 Obediently.