N. Levashov's «SvetL Broom» in A. Khatybov's «Bath School» Book 3. The Cell and Health

Book 3. The Cell and Health. Chapter 6. Beyond one’s comprehension… 376 Man could already take some more or less reasonable actions. While using the stem injections, a large cancerous hotbed can be formed in a short time, and the Brain changes its structure, as it was described earlier, faster and to a greater extent, which intensifies the process. You can ofen hear that if everything goes this way – why are there no mass deaths of cancer right now? After all, it would seem, right now everything should be growing? Firstly , to assess what is happening – you need to have information. For example, somehow get some data from oncological dispensaries about the number of patients admitted, from polyclinics – about the patients sent to oncological dispensaries (because the number of patients admitted is limited by the capacity of the clinic), from morgues and related places – the number of cancer deaths. It should be compared all these and many other data on the treatment prescribed, and the factual treatment, and other measures taken. And then you can get some information more or less close to reality – the general picture of what is happening at the moment. To see everything in dynamics – IT IS MANDATORY TO GET THE DATA LISTED REGULARLY . I do not think that many people who can boast of access to such information, and besides – the availability of time and desire in order to comprehend all this and come to some conclusions. Much easier, faster and worryless for yourself (guided by the generally accepted position) to catch from the general permitted information what is compatible with it and not contradictory to it – and once again get convinced of your "rightness". Any single fact, (and in most cases a person deals with such single and fragmentary facts, without having and not striving to have a complete picture of what happened even within one case), will be easily and unconditionally regarded as confirmation of the available position. For example, if someone is demonstrated the inconsistency of modern methods of cancer treating, he immediately remembers some of his acquaintances or relatives who were operated on for cancer 17 years ago, and he is still in good health. This fact will smash everything that has been said, even based on no less than a hundred reliable facts. Although in practice, knowing a certain proportion of processes that really occur in a person, including oncological problems – it seems to be ABSOLUTELY IMPRUDENT AND HASTY, to judge the success of the cure by so fragmentary facts, all the more, attributing it to the actions of medical workers. After all, in order to assess the real picture of what is happening with one single person, one must know both the causes of the disease, the person himself, the "case history", the methods of treatment, and everything that happened in the process of recovery, and, in the end, the