N. Levashov's «SvetL Broom» in A. Khatybov's «Bath School» Book 3. The Cell and Health

Book 3. The Cell and Health. Chapter 5. They drink drugs to health 322 norms of religious morality and medical ethics. This is a feature of the professional and ethical portrait of an Orthodox doctor. I want to note the following – humanity has a starting point – as soon as the monkey grabbed a stick, it began to think. The spine below the ribs is called "horse tail" in medicine. This indicates the continuity of knowledge and transfers the "king of nature" (even if he is an Orthodox Christian) on a par with mammals, and in some cases – with a herring (look back on our reasoning in this book about the fish having a cold nuclear fusion generator, which a man does not have, but I do not know about Orthodox Christian fish. One can believe everything that science has presented to us today, including medicine built on faith and Christian Orthodoxy, BUT KNOWLEDGE CAN NOT BE BASED ON THIS, and "a direct and convincing proof of the lack of science is the church" (let them explain …the "miracles"), as A. Khatybov liked to say. I can only say one thing: hardly any of these representatives from "medicine" will be taken to the Bath . Because they have already been "washed" in another, "gold-covered" premises. And God help them. 5.13. Without regard anyone’s opinion ... When I am told: "Listen, there is one man here, a doctor, too.., applies" new "technologies... Go and see – his technique is similar to your technologises..." Or "You know, I examined everything that this doctor does and if to add yours and his, then this will be a definite breakthrough... " To be honest, I'm tired of repeating the same thing: firstly , I'm not a doctor and I do not want to be called this word. Secondly , I continue N. Levashov's work, and take my word for it, not only in matters of Technologies, which, perhaps, can be clear after reading this book. People who understand in this direction at least something (not to mention "more"), except for the few that I know (and I ask not to be confused with those who "...based on Levashov's knowledge..."), to my regret, are still very few in the world, and I have to do my best to make themmore. I emphasize : not only in Russia, but in the whole world. In this matter, even his "successors" (none of them, no matter how much they like it) understand anything. Maximum to which all sorts of "followers", "experts" and "Levashov's knowledge applicants" or those who refer to Levashov and his alleged "methods" are nothing but "treatment" through "handwaving" with the obligatory shaking off the "stuck negative". Or