N. Levashov's «SvetL Broom» in A. Khatybov's «Bath School» Book 3. The Cell and Health

Book 3. The Cell and Health. Chapter 3. Knowledge and Illusions 178 realized at the moment of its execution. And perhaps this punishment might not immediately manifest itself, but sooner or later the executor will get "in full". And no "donations" will change the deserved "punishment". And, actually it is not a "punishment" , in the full sense of the word, as there is no one who "punishes", since the " PUNISHER" IS NATURE ITSELF , or TO BE MORE PRECISE, THE LAWS OF NATURE – the evolution of living matter... I would like to pay special attention to what is happening with those who give orders to others, making them take actions that they, quite possibly, themselves would have never done on their own. Of course, all the processes that were mentioned above take place with the one who orders, the existence of an order does not pardon the executor of an order from all the processes mentioned above. Nature does not depend on the orders given by one person to another or others and does not obey them. Nature does not depend on whether people understand the laws of nature in the right or the wrong way and what kind of religious or social laws exist in the society. The laws of Nature are such as they are, whether we like them or not. But, nevertheless, this does not mean that the "last", or "scapegoat" is only a servile performer, no matter howmuch those who give such orders want. The one who gives order (s) to make others perform them, creates psychic effects on the performers, to make them carry out the orders. For all that, the leader – since, only the leader is able to make or convince others of the need for certain actions and get them fulfilled – has to dispose the performers to the "realization" of the determined or necessary action. Otherwise it will turn out like in Krylov's famous fable about the crab, swan and pike, that tried to move a cart. And what determines the degree of kindness of the performed deed. Or at least – whether it is right or not to take some deed for a good one. After all, the duality of one’s judgments sometimes reaches absurdity, especially if we consider the phenomenon not isolated, but in combination with others, including cause-and-effect relationships. The deed, accomplished at the current moment of time, can be unambiguously perceived as good, and after a while it can become absolutely not good. Or, from the point of view of one person, the deed belongs to the category of good, but from the others point of view, the same deed is the worst evil . What is that yardstick that determines the direction of changes at all levels of the Human Spirit and on the physically dense body? Perhaps, the solution is only in a man’s attitude to what he is doing? If, in the course of an action, a man realizes all the consequences of what he is doing, understands how the things he is doing