N. Levashov's «SvetL Broom» in A. Khatybov's «Bath School» Book 3. The Cell and Health

Book 3. The Cell and Health. Chapter 3. Knowledge and Illusions 176 In case the emotions accompanying the positive action do not create a sufficiently powerful primary matter ascending flow, the necessary condition for fixing the new "evolutionary flesh" in the cells is the repetition of such an action multiple times. Repeated actions should be performed at time intervals between them less than the time of complete disappearance of the new "evolutionary meat" projection at the cell second body level. Then, the electrochemical bonds between the newly attached atoms and the "skeleton" of DNA or RNA molecules are restored and maintained in a stable state. Usually more meaningful positive actions require stronger emotions for their realization, while less significant positive actions do not require so powerful emotional support for their realization. Therefore, single significant positive actions can create the same qualitative changes, such an increase in "evolutionary flesh", as a large number of less significant actions. In other words, both great good deeds and "minor" ones in the end lead to the evolutionary growth of those who perform them. And from this point of view, there are no "minor" good deeds, because every good deed, regardless of its "size", changes their creators for the better, provides a positive evolutionary shift. The difference is only in the size of this positive evolutionary shift. "Great" good deeds can "show up", maybe only once in the life time; of course, you need to be ready for them when the time comes. But it might also happen that a "great" good deed "goes round " one of us and ... waiting and being ready for anything great, with all the attractiveness of the heroic, is unclaimed. Therefore,you should be ready for "great achievements", but not forget about "minor deeds" which, although not so grandiose, but absolutely real and good, maybe for only one person, but repeated many times, become great. "Minor" good deeds, in principle, sometimes need more self-sacrifice and modesty from their initiator than "great" good deeds, which sometimes require tremendous emotional and mental stress for a very short time. Therefore, you can say that it is much more difficult to do "minor" good deeds, both mentally and morally, because most of them remain unnoticed by others, and often by those for whom they are performed. Undoubtedly, it's much easier to be a "visible" "hero for an hour" than an "invisible" all your life. And there is no criterion for making a conclusion and a choice, which is more significant. Well, probably, no criterion is needed, but it is necessary to do minor good and great good, whatever each of us come across in our life and let someone else astimamate the greatness of our actions. And is the appreciation of the surrounding that important to the creators of the good? GOOD IS DONE WITHOUT