N. LEVASHOV'S «SVETL BROOM» IN A. KHATYBOV'S «BATH SCHOOL» AND A LABOUR SPADE. BOOK 4. THE PHYSICS OF THE REALITIES

F. Shkrudnev N. Levashov's "SvetL Broom" in A. Khatybov's "Bath School" and A Labour Spade 315 possibilities of their application – and not only in relation to improving people's health, but also harmonizing them with Nature itself as part of the change in the Life Support System. This is just the beginning of a long way. But at the beginning of this way one should express the way itself, i.e. scientific assumption about the world created, and its practical demonstration – in harmony with the surrounding Nature, as N. Levashov felt about it. "The Constructive Theory of Everything" – exists , but nowadays in its complete form for various reasons can not be accessible to everyone. There is still a sufficient number of "willing" to make experiments and mostly for some reason within the framework of the destruction of both Human and all living things. But it is unnecessary to make an occasion to some worries, or a loophole for excuses for yourself regarding your thoughts of wasted time and life, as can be seen from the letters that come to me. There are a sufficient number of works opened to public that are necessary and useful to study ( with all my respect for the heritage of N. Levashov and A. Khatybov ), or at least to become familiar with. Reflections in the future tense are a good Brain training. It's even better than just getting everything ready at once or "after learning", for example, Levashov's "Heterogeneous Universe" (a wonderful work that opens a lot), "to be of use", carrying it to the masses. Without it – nothing works and will not work. Take, for example, the works of A. A. Luchin . They are open, not hidden anywhere, the author is cheerful and continues to work. Everything created by him should be carefully studied. Of course, you do not have to idealize. It is always necessary to be, as Nicolai wrote, not inside the theory, but above, outside it. Then everything will be in accordance with reality, and not with someone's ideas about it. Of course, this will be your view and your knowledge, but it will have a correct vector, determined not by someone or something, but by the wish to know the truth. I, for example, have never combined information from Levashov's books and information from Khatibov's. I alternated it, and it worked. Here, for example, how, in general, matter is formed in the universe? Ask one of your friends dealing with "modern" science. It turns out that they somehow never asked this question. Well, if in the Russian Academy of Sciences this question is asked, there are many whose round eyes will become square. – Has it ever been formed? This is normal and natural! "Bang!" And it appeared!.. – No, "guys!" make your "Bangs" in the "Commission on Pseudoscience" and I ask you idiotic, in your opinion, question: "In what way is the matter in the Universe formed?"