BOOK 2. THE BATH SCHOOL. N. LEVASHOV'S «SVETL BROOM» IN A. KHATYBOV'S «BATH SCHOOL» AND A LABOUR SPADE

F. Shkrudnev N. Levashov's "SvetL Broom" in A. Khatybov's "Bath School" and A Labour Spade 187 convince them of anything. I am convinced of one thing: they will not be taken to the Bath, no matter how much they try to get there. And since we are talking about the object that is supposed (or not supposed) to be taken to the Bath, in an appropriate healthy state, I am giving you an example . MOST PEOPLE ARE ABSOLUTELY CONVINCED of medical science being constantly developing (moving forward with leaps and bounds, implementing nanotechnology, etc.), medicines getting better and more effective, and getting help only in the relevant institutions (clinics, hospitals , medical centers, etc.). However, few people are able to think of the fact why, if everything is so good and progressive, the mortality from the most awful diseases grows steadily from year to year? Accordingly, the demand for drugs and medical services is also increasing like an avalanche. And this is when it must fall steadily. If the advertised achievements of medicine were really worth of anything, then the number of cases would have to have fallen. But it is growing . But nobody wants to notice it and take it into account. I'm not talking about any alternative to this process in relation to "SvetL" Programs , but for the period of their application, which is more than 6 years, we can confidently say that when the Programs "face" serious diseases (and there are quite a lot of such examples) , then, with rare exceptions, for some reason (?) the Programs win . All this is directly related to the preconception in question. It's a vice. It can not be named otherwise. This vice has many different names- synonyms, which is due to the fact that it was noticed and described by different people, until they came to the generally accepted term. One of the most known is the "Semmelweis reflex", i.e. reflexive rejection of new knowledge that contradicts to existing norms, habits or paradigms. There are also such names as "selective thinking", "tendentious selection of facts", "mental constipation". IT IS POSSIBLE to explain TO THE PERSON SLOWLY GRASPING THINGS most tricky things, if he has not made up any idea about them yet. But you can not explain THE PERSON MOST QUICKLY GRASPING THINGS the simplest thing, if he is firmly convinced that he knows, undoubtedly knows, what is explained to him.