BOOK 2. THE BATH SCHOOL. N. LEVASHOV'S «SVETL BROOM» IN A. KHATYBOV'S «BATH SCHOOL» AND A LABOUR SPADE

F. Shkrudnev N. Levashov's "SvetL Broom" in A. Khatybov's "Bath School" and A Labour Spade 9 Introduction , or the wish in the reality … The only person who you should compare yourself with is you in the past. And the only person you should be better is you at present. The principal quality of knowledge, science, the process of the reality perception is open-mindedness to changes, continuous variability in the mode of thinking and its content. The activity of the mind is the driving force of knowledge! The abundance of fruit is the result! As N. Levashov used to say, sooner or later there come out research workers who give up seeking innovations in the old tracks, who begin disturbing once established formulations of the nature laws, making scientific concepts lose their universality . Perhaps the point is that, by his conclusions , N. Levashov brought us close to unraveling the fact that has been stirring the minds of people, since the depths of centuries that the development of mankind is under the invisible control of a CERTAIN FOREIGN POWER, HAVING ITS LOYAL SERVANTS amid mankind itself. They are those "throttles and servants of darkness" (dark forces) that control the development of the "official" science, carefully ensuring that ordinary people would not be able to free themselves from the delusion of the parasitic satanic system that has trapped their consciousness with the psyche-information web. And it is to this hostile force that various occult and religious societies, orthodox religions and official scientific structures like the pseudo-scientific commission of the Russian Academy of Sciences serve. Fulfilling the will of their masters, they subject to persecution the researchers of new knowledge, not fitting into their canons in order to hamper the development of Mankind. But the point is that they will never fulfill this task. I think that after reading the first book of my narrative, the reader has already begun to realize it. The present day science is entirely built on faith in the authority of its predecessors, the importance of tradition, and the "objectivity" of the truth achieved. For all that, few people are embarrassed by the fact that the number of scientists who has observed the birth of new particles is smaller by orders of magnitude than people who personally watched, for example, the Holy Fire (when it was possible to watch it) or those who outlived their own presentiments - I'm not talking about the burning problem of

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MzY2ODMx